Electro-acupuncture versus conventional analgesia: a comparison of pain levels during oocyte aspiration and patients' experiences of well-being after surgery

Gejervall, A. L.

Stener-Victorin, E.

Moller, A.

Janson, P. O.

Werner, C.

Bergh, C.

Human reproduction

2005

20(3)

728-735

RCT

Acu Versus Usual Care

Analgesia

Anxiety

Electroacupuncture

Fixed Acupuncture Protocol

In Vitro Fertilization

Pain

RCT

Restricted Modalities, Acupuncture Only

Usual Care Control, Pharmaceutical

TCM Acupuncture Style

Women's Health

Reproductive Techniques, Assisted

IVF

Fertilization In Vitro

Infertility, Female

BACKGROUND: The primary aims were to compare the pain-relieving effect and post-operative well-being between electro-acupuncture analgesia (EA) and conventional analgesia (CA) comprising opiates. Further aims were to compare time for mobilization, and costs for time and drug consumption. METHODS: In all, 160 women undergoing IVF were randomized, according to a computer-generated list, to EA or CA. Well-being was evaluated with the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Pain and subjective expectations and experiences were recorded on a visual analogue scale (VAS). Time and drug consumption were recorded. RESULTS: Although VAS pain ratings were significantly higher at oocyte aspiration (P < 0.0001) and after retrieval (P < 0.01) in the EA than in the CA group, they were similar 60 min after surgery. Both groups had similar STAI well-being scores. The EA group was significantly less tired and confused than the CA group after oocyte aspiration. No significant differences in time and costs for drug consumption were noted. CONCLUSION: EA cannot generally be recommended as a pain-relieving method at oocyte aspiration but might be an alternative for women desiring a non-pharmacological method. An advantage of EA is less post-operative tiredness and confusion compared with CA

Reproductive Techniques, Assisted

N/A

160

1 Day