toggle visibility Search & Display Options

Select All    Deselect All
 |   | 
Details
   print

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/acutrialsocom/public_html/refbase-ocom/includes/include.inc.php on line 5275
  Record Links
Author (up) Foster, N. E.; Thomas, E.; Hill, J. C.; Hay, E. M. url  openurl
  Title The relationship between patient and practitioner expectations and preferences and clinical outcomes in a trial of exercise and acupuncture for knee osteoarthritis Type of Study RCT
  Year 2009 Publication European journal of pain : EJP Abbreviated Journal Eur J Pain  
  Volume Issue Pages -  
  Keywords Acu Versus > 1 Control; Acupuncture; Miscellaneous; Non Penetrating Sham, Mechanical; Osteoarthritis, Knee; Patient-Practitioner Relationship; RCT; Sham Control; Usual Care Control, Educational; Usual Care Control, Physical; Verum Acupoint Control; AcuTrials; Arthritis  
  Abstract We investigated the relationship between patient and therapist preferences and expectations and clinical outcomes in a trial of exercise and acupuncture for clinical knee osteoarthritis. 352 Patients were randomised to advice and exercise or advice and exercise plus true or non-penetrating acupuncture. Before randomisation, patients recorded their general outcome expectations, treatment-specific preferences and expectations. Clinical outcome was (a) change scores on the Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and (b) treatment response according to the OMERACT-OARSI criteria. Physiotherapists recorded their treatment expectations and preferences for each patient following an assessment prior to randomisation. We investigated the relationship between (a) patient, (b) therapist and (c) matched patient-therapist preferences and expectations on clinical outcomes using univariate and multivariate analyses. There was no significant relationship between patients' treatment preferences and clinical outcomes at 6 or 12months nor between patients' expectations and pain (WOMAC) at 6 or 12months. Using our secondary outcome (OMERART-OARSI), those who received the treatment for which they had high expectations of benefit were almost twice as likely to be classified as a treatment responder at 6months (odds ratio (OR) 1.7 (95% Confidence Interval 1.06, 2.79)) and 12months (OR) 1.9 (1.13, 3.13). Therapists' preferences and expectations for individual patients did not add further explanation of outcomes. There was no evidence of a relationship between patients' treatment preferences or expectations and pain reduction. We found weak evidence, from secondary outcomes, that patients' expectations, both general and treatment-specific, are related to clinical outcome from exercise and acupuncture  
  Address Arthritis Research Campaign National Primary Care Centre, Primary Care Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, United Kingdom  
  Publisher
  Language Number of Treatments  
  Treatment Follow-up 52 Weeks Frequency N/A Number of Participants 352  
  Time in Treatment N/A Condition Osteoarthritis, Knee
  Disease Category Arthritis OCSI Score  
  Notes Approved no  
  Call Number Serial 334  
Permanent link to this record
Select All    Deselect All
 |   | 
Details
   print

Save Citations:
Export Records: